Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40391382›Full record

ArticleStatistics and computing2025

Extended fiducial inference for individual treatment effects via deep neural networks.

Sehwan Kim, Faming Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sehwan KimDepartment of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 03760 Republic of Korea.
Faming LiangDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.

Funding

Stochastic Deep Learning for Electronic Health Records: Localizing Learning with Massive and Fragmented DataR01GM152717 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LIANG, FAMING, WANG, XIAOFENG · 2023 to 2025
$600k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM152717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual treatment effect estimation has gained significant attention in recent data science literature. This work introduces the Double Neural Network (Double-NN) method to address this problem within the framework of extended fiducial inference (EFI). In the proposed method, deep neural networks are used to model the treatment and control effect functions, while an additional neural network is employed to estimate their parameters. The universal approximation capability of deep neural networks ensures the broad applicability of this method. Numerical results highlight the superior performance of the proposed Double-NN method compared to the conformal quantile regression (CQR) method in individual treatment effect estimation. From the perspective of statistical inference, this work advances the theory and methodology for statistical inference of large models. Specifically, it is theoretically proven that the proposed method permits the model size to increase with the sample size Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11222-025-10624-8.

Indexed as

Causal InferenceDeep LearningFiducial InferenceStochastic Gradient MCMCUncertainty Quantification

Identifiers

PMID40391382
PMCPMC12085359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.