Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40391380›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Physician mergers involve 38% of doctors, substantial health system participation, and frequent serial acquisition.

Daniel Deibler, Daniel Hosken, Thomas Koch, Marshall Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel DeiblerUS Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics, Washington, DC 20580, United States.
Daniel HoskenUS Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics, Washington, DC 20580, United States.
Thomas KochUS Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics, Washington, DC 20580, United States.
Marshall ThomasUS Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics, Washington, DC 20580, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the incidence of mergers between US physician firms. We considered the role of health systems in physician merger activity and the extent to which individual firms engage in multiple acquisitions, or "roll-up" behavior. We used a unique collection of subpoenaed data from 6 insurers in 15 states, which account for approximately 80% of commercially insured members in those states between 2015 and 2020. Over 6 years, we observed 2019 mergers between physician firms that spanned from small single-specialty practices to large groups affiliated with health systems. Approximately 20% of the roughly 15 000 firms were involved in a merger. Of the nearly 400 000 doctors in our sample, 38% were employed by firms involved in a merger, although only 3.8% of the doctors were part of an acquired group. Sixty-three firms made more than 5 acquisitions, and 3 made more than 20 acquisitions. Health care systems, responsible for approximately 40% of mergers, frequently engaged in serial acquisitions. Acquired physician firms are typically small (<10 doctors), and much smaller than the acquiring firm. We document that many physician mergers occurred in 15 states over 5 years. A significant fraction of the physician mergers we identified, especially those involving health systems, exhibited characteristics that could indicate the potential for competitive harm. Our results suggest that researchers should examine the degree to which these competitively suspect mergers have affected competition.

Indexed as

health system acquisitionsphysician mergersroll-ups

Identifiers

PMID40391380
PMCPMC12086535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.