ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025
Epidemiological analysis of African swine fever in the European Union during 2024.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulsed Resource Events Mediate Fluctuations in Wild Boar (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Epidemiological analysis of African swine fever in the European Union during 2025.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Integrated Hunting Strategies for African Swine Fever Control in Wild Boar: A Comparative Review of Experiences in European Continent.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Cryopreservation and In Vitro Culture of Isolated Porcine Ovarian Follicles.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Early African Swine Fever Dynamics in Wild Boar After Reemergence in Catalonia, Spain: Surveillance-Based Estimates of Initial Spread.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- First detection and characterization of a non-haemadsorbing African swine fever virus (genotype II) isolated from a wild boar in Russia.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Patterns of Agricultural Crop Damage by Wild Boar (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of African Swine Fever in Free-Ranging Wild Boar (Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Epidemiological analysis of African swine fever in the European Union during 2024.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Safety of Live Attenuated ASFV-G-ΔI177L/ΔLVR Vaccination in Sows With Advanced Pregnancies.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During 2024, the number of EU Member States affected by African swine fever (ASF) decreased from 14 to 13, with Sweden regaining freedom and no new Member State becoming infected. ASF outbreaks in domestic pigs in the EU declined by 83% compared to 2023, primarily due to fewer outbreaks in Croatia and Romania, although Romania notified 66% of the 333 outbreaks in the EU. Most outbreaks (78%) occurred in establishments with fewer than 100 pigs. However, an increase in outbreaks in establishments with more than 100 pigs was observed in Italy and Poland. Like previous years, there was a clear seasonality for domestic pig outbreaks, with 51% of them notified between July and September. Most of the outbreaks in domestic pigs were detected through passive surveillance based on clinical suspicion (79.4%), while fewer outbreaks were detected through enhanced passive surveillance involving systematic testing of dead pigs (14.2%) and 6.4% through tracing contacts after outbreak detection. In wild boar, the number of outbreaks notified has remained stable since 2022 (between 7000 and 8000) with a less clear seasonality than for domestic pigs, and a winter peak observed only in Hungary, Italy, Poland and Slovakia. Overall, 29% of the 23,919 wild boar carcasses found during passive surveillance activities tested positive for ASFv by PCR, representing 70.4% of the wild boar outbreaks in the EU. In contrast, around 0.4% of the 412,753 hunted wild boar tested positive by PCR, representing 28.4% of the wild boar outbreaks. While the use of serological tests performed in wild boar decreased, the number of PCR tests remained stable. Despite the reduction in the number of outbreaks in domestic pigs, the total size of the restricted zones III in the EU remained stable, with a slight increase in restricted zones II + III in 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.