ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2025
Real-life efficacy and safety of oral propranolol for ocular adnexal infantile hemangiomas: observational cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral propranolol for the treatment of ocular adnexal infantile hemangiomas. Patients and methods: retrospective observational cohort study. Propranolol was administered at an initial oral dose of 1 mg/kg and subsequently increased to 2 mg/kg for 1 year. Outcomes were evaluated by comparing pre- and post-treatment clinical findings, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) findings and/or orbital magnetic resonance imaging findings from baseline to 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Regression was graded as follows: satisfactory when 90% and above of the baseline lesion volume and extension decreased, acceptable when 50 to 90%, mediocre when 30 to 50%, poor less than 30%. Results: Twenty-four patients were included in this study. The mean age at presentation was 4 ± 1 week. Sixteen (71%) patients were females and 7 (29%) were males. The mean follow-up duration was 18 ± 3 months. Therapy was started for of 23/24 patients at 5 weeks old, of 1/24 started at 9 weeks of age. The median age was 5,16 weeks. Sixteen patients (66%) had satisfactory resolution between 3 and 6 weeks, 5 (20%) after 9 weeks, and 3 (12%) after 12 weeks. One patient (5%) had a mediocre response after 24 weeks. One patient withdrew from therapy because of hypoglycemia, which was successfully managed as an outpatient. No significant adverse reactions, such as bradycardia, hypotension, bronchospasm, or congestive heart failure, were detected in this cohort. Conclusion: This study indicates that the real-life use of oral propranolol for infantile hemangioma yields a high success rate with a lower morbidity than previously reported, particularly when managed by a proficient and multidisciplinary team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.