ArticleJournal of caring sciences2025
Effects of Early Mobilization on Hemodynamics and Pain after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of caring sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) can improve quality of life by undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), but they may face various complications. Early mobilization can help prevent these complications. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of two early mobilization protocols on pain and hemodynamic outcomes in patients who had CABG surgery. Methods: This was a randomized, blinded clinical trial with a three-arm parallel design, conducted on 105 patients who underwent CABG at Shahid Madani hospital in Tabriz. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups: control, first intervention, and second intervention. The control group received standard care, while two intervention groups received early mobilization based on passive and active range of motion (ROM) activities and early mobilization based on deep breathing exercises respectively. Data were collected using a questionnaire that measured pain intensity using a facial pain scale and hemodynamic indicators using a monitor device. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 24 software and descriptive and inferential statistics methods. Results: According to the study, the second intervention group is more effective than the first intervention group. The results indicated that in both morning and evening shifts, the mean of systolic blood pressure (SBP) increased significantly in three groups. Also, the mean of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) increased significantly in both shifts in intervention group 1 and control. The mean of DBP decreased (MD=-26.0, 95% CI: -5.6 to -1.2; Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the effects of early mobilization interventions on patients after CABG, but more research is needed to determine the optimal timing and intensity of mobilization protocols for patients after CABG and to explore the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of these interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.