Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40391278›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pain research2025

Comparison of Costotransverse Foramen Block with Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block for Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.

Jing Li, Peiqi Shao, Hong Wen, Danxu Ma, Lina Yang, Jianshuai He, Jia Jiang

Abstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jing Li *Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongzhou District Hospital of Integrated TCM and Western Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Peiqi Shao *Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hong WenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Danxu MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lina YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jianshuai HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jia JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of costotransverse foramen block for postoperative analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Patients and Methods: Seventy-five patients undergoing elective VATS under general anaesthesia were recruited to this double-blind, non- inferiority trial and randomized to preoperatively receive a thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB group), a costotransverse foramen block (CTFB group), or an erector spinae plane block (ESPB group) with 0.5% ropivacaine 20 mL at T5 level. The primary outcome was the postoperative numerical rating scale pain score assessed at 6 h. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at other time points, total opioids consumption at 24 h postoperatively, time to first patient-controlled analgesia pump bolus, number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, dermatomal coverage at 30 min after block, time to perform the block, satisfaction scores of the analgesic effect, block-related side effects, and other complications. The health-related quality of life was evaluated one month after surgery. Results: The pain scores at 6 h after surgery were 0 (0, 3) in the TPVB group, 0 (0, 2) in the CTFB group, and 4 (3, 4) in the ESPB group. The 95% CI of median difference was 0 to 0 comparing CTFB with TPVB and -4 to -2 comparing CTFB with ESPB. Both the upper 95% CI limits were lower than the predefined noninferiority margin of 1. The pain scores at postanaesthesia care unit, 1 h, 6 h and 12 h after surgery, number of block dermatomes, patient satisfaction scores, time to perform the block as well as the time to first analgesia pump bolus were significantly different between the CTFB group and ESPB group. No differences were detected in other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided CTFB provided noninferior analgesia compared to TPVB at 6 h after VATS. Additionally, CTFB might provide better analgesia to ESPB although larger confirmatory researches for superiority are further warranted.

Indexed as

postoperative analgesiaregional anesthesiathoracoscopic surgeryultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40391278
PMCPMC12087602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.