ArticleBMJ public health2025
Sexual behaviours and lifestyles associated with poor mental health among British adults during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a large, quasirepresentative, cross-sectional web-panel survey (Natsal-COVID).
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: A national lockdown was implemented in the UK from March 2020 to reduce COVID-19 transmission which impacted mental health and sexual behaviours. This study investigated the association between sexual behaviours and poor mental health among British adults during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods and analysis: The Natsal-COVID web-panel survey is a quasirepresentative population sample of 6654 British adults (18-59 years; July-August 2020). We examined associations between sexual behaviours in the 4 months after the start of the first lockdown and poor mental health in the past 2 weeks (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2 for depression and Generalised Anxiety Disorder-2 for anxiety, combined into PHQ-4 for psychological distress) using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among participants with complete data (n=6500), 54.8% reported psychological distress (28.0% mild, 15.6% moderate and 11.3% severe). After adjusting for age, gender and relationship status, psychological distress was higher among participants identifying as bisexual (adjusted OR 2.13 (95% CI: 1.61 to 2.82)) or other minority sexual identities (3.20, 1.60-6.41) compared with heterosexual. Psychological distress was also higher among those reporting experiencing sexual difficulties (very often/always vs never: 3.70, 2.64-5.18) or 2+partners since lockdown (compared with one: 3.90, 2.78-5.47). Psychological distress was less among participants reporting higher sexual frequency (5+occasions of sex in the past 4 weeks vs none: 0.64, 0.48-0.86). Conclusions: Psychological distress was common among British adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, and this was associated with sexual behaviours. These findings have important implications for the design and implementation of interventions for populations at risk of poor mental and sexual health, including during international crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.