ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Shared-care management standards of palliative care in Chinese adults: A Delphi study.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the expectations of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care services: a qualitative study in mainland China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Shared-care management (SCM) in palliative care is a collaborative model where shared care teams work in partnership with patients' original health care providers, employing multimodal strategies including consultations and coordinated referrals to enhance quality of care for patients. The evidence regarding its implementation remains fragmented and lacks detailed explanations, which impedes its application in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a SCM standard of palliative care in adults in mainland regions of China. Methods: Initial standard framework identification was achieved via literature evidence summary. From April to August 2024, two rounds of Delphi method was conducted with the purposes of modifying the standard. To establish consensus, items with a mean importance score > 3.50 and the coefficient of variation of item scores < 0.25 were retained. Results: The first round involved 35 experts, with a follow-up participation of 33 in the second round. The Kendall concordance coefficients of the two rounds of experts consultation were 0.128 and 0.134, respectively (all Conclusions: The establishment of the standard in this study provides a critical framework that can be adopted by health care institutions to ensure that SCM services are delivered uniformly and effectively in mainland regions of China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.