Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40391088›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025

ComBat-met: adjusting batch effects in DNA methylation data.

Junmin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Junmin WangData Sciences and Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA 02451, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3728-9538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integration of genomics data is routinely hindered by unwanted technical variations known as batch effects. Despite wide availability, existing batch correction methods often fall short in capturing the unique characteristics of DNA methylation data. We present ComBat-met, a beta regression framework to adjust batch effects in DNA methylation studies. Our method fits beta regression models to the data, calculates batch-free distributions, and maps the quantiles of the estimated distributions to their batch-free counterparts. Compared to traditional methods, ComBat-met followed by differential methylation analysis shows improved statistical power without compromising false positive rates based on simulated data. Additionally, we demonstrate the ability of ComBat-met to remove cross-batch variations and recover biological signals using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenomicsAlgorithmsHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40391088
PMCPMC12086544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.