ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2025
Trends in research on preterm birth in twin pregnancy based on bibliometrics.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Twin pregnancies are associated with a higher risk of perinatal mortality compared to singleton pregnancies. This study evaluated the developmental trends and summarized the key features of research on preterm births in twin pregnancies. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using publications on preterm births in twin pregnancies from 2014 to 2023, retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Network and visual analyses were performed using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software. In total, 1,378 articles were included. Results: The number of publications in this field has shown a steady increase over the past decade. The United States, China, and England collectively contributed more than half of all publications. King's College London, Columbia University, and Jefferson University were identified as the most influential institutions, fostering extensive collaboration and academic exchange. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis offers a comprehensive overview of research trends on preterm births in twin pregnancies, highlighting major contributors, influential institutions, and primary research foci. The findings provide valuable insights for researchers, aiding the identification of future research directions in this critical field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.