Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40391012›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Comparing the impacts of different exercise interventions on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a literature review and meta-analysis.

Shuangtao Xing, Yifan Zhang, Yanjiao Chen, Shijie Feng, Yiqing Zhang, Paulo Moreira

Abstract readComparative StudyNetwork Meta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuangtao XingPhysical Education Institute of Henan Normal University, Henan, Xinxiang, China.
Yifan ZhangDepartment of Public Basic Education of Henan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Henan, Zhoukou, China.
Yanjiao ChenResearch Center for Social Work and Governance, College of Social Affairs, Henan Normal University, Henan, Xinxiang, China.
Shijie FengPhysical Education Institute of Henan Normal University, Henan, Xinxiang, China.
Yiqing ZhangResearch Center for Social Work and Governance, College of Social Affairs, Henan Normal University, Henan, Xinxiang, China.
Paulo MoreiraInternational Healthcare Management Research & Development Center (IHM-RDC), First Affiliated Hospital of the Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Exercise interventions are a recommended method of diabetes management through which patients can achieve blood glucose control, increase muscle volume, and improve insulin sensitivity, while also improving blood lipids, blood pressure, and cardiovascular health. A few studies on the effects of physical exercise on diabetic patients have been published in recent years. This article focuses on exploring evidence on which exercise interventions generate which effects in diabetic patients, namely, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), method training (MT), aerobic exercise training (AET), resistance training (RT), and combined training (CBT). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that focused on the effects of exercise interventions on blood glucose and blood lipids of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were reviewed. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare the effects of the five exercise interventions in diabetic patients, namely the impacts on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). The study was strictly conducted following the PRISMA Protocol, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2.0 was used to objectively evaluate the risk of bias in the implementation of the study. Results: This review included 25 RCTs in total, with 1,711 subjects. Meta-analysis suggests that, compared with conventional therapeutic treatment, exercise interventions can reduce blood glucose indexes, namely HbA1c, FBG, TC, TG, HDL, and LDL. RT and AET have been shown to reduce TC; HIIT, MT, AET, and CBT have been shown to improve HDL; and HIIT, MT, AET, and CBT have been shown to improve HDL. The MT and RT exercise types can reduce LDL. Evidence also suggests that MT can lower HbA1c, TG, and LDL levels, and RT lowers cholesterol levels. HIIT exercise appears to improve FBG and HDL levels. Conclusion: The five types of exercise generate different effects on the key clinical dimensions of diabetes. MT seems to be the optimal choice to improve HbA1c, TG levels, and LDL, while HIIT improves FBG and HDL levels, whereas RT exercise appears to be the optimal exercise to lower cholesterol levels.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseExercise TherapyBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansLipidsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResistance TrainingBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinLipidsdiabetes managementexercise interventionshealthcare managementmeta-analysistype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID40391012
PMCPMC12086073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.