ReviewGlobal cardiology science & practice2025
Group D of pulmonary arterial hypertension and its relationship to congenital heart disease: Is there a non-invasive way to predict the unpredictable?
Review in Global cardiology science & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial hypertension related to congenital heart disease (PAH-CHD), can pose a few challenging therapeutic challenges. PAH related to CHD can be classified into 4 clinical groups: Group A, which includes patients with Eisenmenger syndrome; Group B, which includes patients with severe PAH due to significant shunt lesions with no reversal of the shunt and no cyanosis; Group C, which includes patients with PAH due to small defects whose clinical picture is comparable to that of IPAH (idiopathic PAH) patients; and Group D, which includes patients with persistent PAH following CHD repair. This review aims to shed light on the possible laboratory markers that can predict whether pulmonary arterial hypertension secondary to a congenital heart defect will improve after repair of the defect or will continue to progress because the patient's PAH is mediated by idiopathic changes and not the shunt lesion itself. This differentiation is crucial for predicting PH prognosis after cardiac repair. See Figure 1 for graphical abstract. 10.7717/gcsp.202505/fig-1Figure 1.Graphical abstract showing laboratory predictors of irreversible pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.