Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390964›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2025

Evaluation of Bupivacaine Injection Instillation Directly in the Rectus Sheath in LSCS Cases as an Effective Analgesia Method.

Tripti Dubey, Shivangi Dubey Yadav, Amey Kundawar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tripti DubeyApollo Hospital, Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1648-2959
Shivangi Dubey YadavSeth G.S Medical College, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra India.
Amey KundawarSeth G.S Medical College, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An ideal post-cesarean section analgesic plan should aim for high-quality pain relief with minimal side effects, no risk of transfer through breast milk, and a faster return to normal maternal functioning. This study is aimed to assess the efficacy of analgesic action of direct infiltration of bupivacaine in patients undergoing LSCS. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional record analysis, assessing the medical records of 49 patients who were included from the medical records department of Apollo hospital, Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Results: 49% patients did not require analgesics in the first 12 h postoperatively. The mean time of first demand of analgesia was 3.44 h (SD = 5.45). 61.2% patients were mobilized in 14 h or less postoperatively. In 69.4% patients, oral intake was initiated within 3 h of the surgery. 73.5% patient's initiated breastfeeding immediately after the surgery. At 4 h after surgery, the pain score was an average of 0.49 (SD = 0.79). 79.6% patients did not report postoperative nausea and vomiting. No patients reported wound infection or dehiscence post-surgery. Conclusion: Bupivacaine infiltration post-cesarean section is a safe, effective and convenient method since it requires minimal available resources and no additional skills or supervision from medical experts. Hence, it is more suitable, especially in developing countries and rural/peripheral hospitals/maternity centers where the availability of equipment like USG machine may be difficult, making cheap, accessible yet effective analgesic options the need of the hour in post-LSCS patients.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaBupivacaine infiltrationPost-caesarean section

Identifiers

PMID40390964
PMCPMC12085519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.