ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2025
Patient Satisfaction After Subcuticular Sutures and Metallic Staples for Skin Closure in Caesarean Section: A Randomized Study at a Tertiary Centre.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A variety of materials and techniques are used for skin closure after caesarean section (CS), common ones being sutures and staples. The technique chosen should be simple, quick, painless, and provide good cosmesis with least wound complications, and there is a need to identify which provides the best outcome. Objectives: The aim was to compare metallic surgical staples versus subcuticular sutures for skin closure after caesarean delivery in terms of wound complications, skin closure time, pain score on day 3, and patient satisfaction after 6 weeks. Materials and methods: A total of 300 women undergoing CS with Pfannenstiel incision were randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes. Skin closure was done, and time was noted simultaneously. Wound condition and pain score were assessed on day 3 and 6 weeks post-operatively. Results: On day 3 post-operatively, 22% patients in each group had abnormal healing. After 6 weeks, 1.37% patients with sutures and 3.44% patients with staples had abnormal healing (p value 0.39). Total 10 patients (3.33%), 5 in each group, underwent resuturing within 6 weeks post-operatively. Staples reduced skin closure time as compared to sutures (p value <0.001). Mean pain score was comparable between two groups on day 3 post-operatively (p value 0.08) and at 6 weeks (p value 0.45). Patient satisfaction score considering the appearance and comfort of scar was comparable between both groups (p value 0.25). Conclusion: Staples and subcuticular sutures are equivalent to each other, and the choice of skin closure material is at the discretion of the surgeon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.