ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2025
Symptomatic Vaginal Masses Mimicking Prolapse: Varied Clinical Course, Diagnosis and Their Management.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to study the different clinical presentation of symptomatic vaginal masses and outcomes of patients with important implications for surveillance, monitoring and management. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of 20 patients at a tertiary care centre with symptomatic vaginal masses other than prolapse presented between May 2021 and October 2023. Patients were included if they had symptomatic vaginal masses other than prolapse and underwent treatment for the same. Data were analysed by statistical software Stata 14.0. Descriptive statistics were computed to summarize the frequency of demographic and clinical variables. Quantitative variable expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation) and median (minimum-maximum). Categorical variable expressed as frequency and percentage. Results: The median age of the patients included in the analysis was 39.5 years old. A total of 15 patients underwent surgical management, which included vaginal excision or marsupialization, and 5 were conservatively managed. Presenting symptoms included feeling of a mass or bulge in 12 (60%) of patients, urinary complaint ( Conclusion: Vaginal masses are rare and often asymptomatic, but may present with varied clinical symptoms. They can be managed conservatively and surgically with good outcome. Follow-up is very essential to understand different clinical symptoms of vaginal masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.