Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390900›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2025

Integration of Prenatal Sonography, Fetal Autopsy, Histopathology and Genetic Tests in Anomalous Fetuses and Diagnostic Yield.

Suchandana Dasgupta, Neha M Bhagwati, Ana Fatima, Poornima Sharma, Shreya Singh Kushwaha, Renu Arora, Charanjit Ahluwalia, Sumitra Bachani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suchandana DasguptaDepatment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5616-0623
Neha M BhagwatiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Holy Family Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Ana FatimaDepatment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Poornima SharmaDepatment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Shreya Singh KushwahaDepatment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Renu AroraDepatment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Charanjit AhluwaliaDepatment of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Sumitra BachaniDepatment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Congenital abnormalities or birth defects occur in approximately 2-4% of live births. These birth defects can commonly occur due to genetic association, infections, nutritional, environmental factors or multifactorial. Role of ultrasound in detecting these anomalies is already established. Fetal autopsy is a valuable adjunct toward establishing the correct diagnosis and narrowing the field of investigations for a specific etiology. Methodology: A prospective observational study was conducted in Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital including 50 women who underwent termination of pregnancy due to prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of anomalous fetus. In 6% women who had advanced gestation beyond 24 weeks, termination was done after taking permission from medical board of the institute. All data were collected and agreement between initial ultrasound diagnosis and autopsy, histopathology and genetic testing was evaluated. Results: Among the study group 56% of women were between 20 and 25 years of age and 14% were a consanguineous couple. Recurrent anomalous condition was present in 8% fetuses. The most frequently involved system in this study was the urinary system (22%) followed by cardiovascular system (16%) and central nervous system (16%) equally. Multisystem involvement was identified in 10% on ultrasound. Autopsy added to prenatal ultrasound diagnosis in 54% cases, histopathology in 22%, prenatal or post-autopsy and histopathology-based genetic testing added to the diagnosis in 32% of cases. Conclusion: We conclude that autopsy, histopathology and genetic testing can significantly improve the diagnostic yield when performed all together or even in isolation.

Indexed as

Fetal anomaliesFetal autopsyGenetic counselingPrenatal genetic testingRole of histopathology in fetal anomalies

Identifiers

PMID40390900
PMCPMC12085723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.