Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390885›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2025

Construction and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model for Predicting Tubal Pregnancy Rupture Based on Nomogram.

Ling Yi, Wenjing Huang, Qunying Liu, Yimei Huang, Yuxian Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ling YiDepartment of Gynecology, Qingyuan City Women and Children Hospital, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0009-0001-3316-0129
Wenjing HuangDepartment of Gynecology, Qingyuan City Women and Children Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Qunying LiuDepartment of Gynecology, Qingyuan City Women and Children Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Yimei HuangDepartment of Gynecology, Qingyuan City Women and Children Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Yuxian LiuDepartment of Gynecology, Qingyuan City Women and Children Hospital, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To explore the risk factors for tubal rupture in tubal pregnancy, construct and validate a prediction model for tubal rupture. Methods: Clinical data from 517 patients with tubal pregnancy from January 2020 to December 2022 were collected. The patients were divided into two groups: the tubal rupture group and the unruptured group. The general clinical data of both groups were analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Subsequently, a risk prediction model was constructed. Results: Univariate analysis revealed that amenorrhea duration, maximum diameter of the mass, pregnancy site, serum β-HCG levels, and maximum diameter of pelvic hematocele were identified as potential risk factors for tubal pregnancy rupture. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed these variables, except for the maximum diameter of pelvic hematocele, as independent risk factors for tubal pregnancy rupture. A prediction model for tubal pregnancy rupture was established and validated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.861 for the training set and 0.887 for the validation set, indicating good discriminative ability of the model. The calibration curves of the training set and validation set showed a good fit between the actual values and the predicted values. Moreover, the decision curve analysis suggested that the model had good clinical applicability. To facilitate the use of the nomogram, a web server was developed at https://ep10.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/. Conclusions: The prediction model for tubal pregnancy rupture, based on the four predictors: amenorrhea duration, pregnancy site, serum β-HCG levels, and maximum diameter of the mass, demonstrated good predictive efficacy.

Indexed as

Prediction modelRisk factorsRupturedTubal pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40390885
PMCPMC12085464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.