Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390866›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025

'How are we going to harm the next trauma patient?' Trauma care providers' perspective on potential harm to trauma patients.

Galinos Barmparas, Bryce Rh Robinson, Babak Sarani, Aaron R Jensen, Todd W Costantini, Avery B Nathens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Galinos BarmparasDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8309-6797
Bryce Rh RobinsonDepartment of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Babak SaraniDepartment of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6247-3004
Aaron R JensenPediatric General Surgery, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6984-1711
Todd W CostantiniDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0215-5327
Avery B NathensAmerican College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The question, "How will the next patient be harmed?" is a component of strategies used to identify latent safety risks in healthcare. We sought to survey a broad audience attending the 2023 annual conference of the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program to record their perception of the risks that might lead to patient harm at their own trauma centers. Methods: Attendees were surveyed with a single free-text question "How are we going to harm the next patient?" using a quick response code. All responses were categorized into clustered themes. To report the results using a standardized reporting taxonomy, the responses were also classified according to the Joint Commission (JC) patient safety event taxonomy for near misses and adverse events. Results were reported as counts and as proportions of responders. Results: During the 3-day duration of the conference, 64 participants provided 80 responses. Provider-related risk (n=16, 25.0%) was the most commonly reported category, followed closely by practice management guideline related (n=14, 21.9%) and communication gaps or failures (n=12, 18.8%). "Clinical performance" was the most commonly reported subclassification in the main category "type" of the JC patient safety event taxonomy (n=34, 53.1%), followed by patient management (n=30, 46.9%). "Human error" was the most common subclassification in the main category "cause" (n=48, 75.0%). Conclusions: Human failures, rather than systems issues, were perceived to be responsible for the majority of potential harm in trauma patients by a broad audience of trauma care providers. These results require amplified focus on strategies that decrease the impact of the human element while enhancing process standardization and addressing barriers to the implementation of processes and guidelines. It might also suggest an opportunity to bring forward alternative conceptual frameworks to advance safety in trauma care.

Indexed as

Multiple Traumapractice guidelineprovidersquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40390866
PMCPMC12086880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.