ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Return to sport and patient reported outcomes in athletes participating in martial arts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at mean follow-up of 12 years.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lateral extra-articular procedures in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduce graft failure rates in elite and competitive athletes: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Structural severity versus clinical reality: Are we measuring the right endpoints?Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Sport-Specific Considerations in ACL Reconstruction: Diagnostic Evaluation and Graft Selection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Return to sport and patient reported outcomes in athletes participating in martial arts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at mean follow-up of 12 years.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to assess anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) outcomes and return to pre-injury sports (RTPS) characteristics in athletes participating in martial arts. Methods: Martial arts athletes over the age of 14 years who underwent primary ACLR with a minimum 1-year follow-up were eligible for this study. This study defined RTPS as reaching pre-injury levels of martial arts participation. Patients completed a questionnaire assessing sports participation, reinjury, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) including International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC SKF), Marx activity score, Tegner activity scale, and visual analogue scale (VAS). Demographics, surgical data, and preoperative PROs were collected retrospectively. Patients were grouped into those who achieved RTPS and those who did not. Statistical analyses included chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney Results: Fifty-two individuals who participated in martial arts (mean age 30.6 ± 11.0 years, 21% female) completed the questionnaire at a mean follow-up of 12.1 ± 7.8 years. Of the cohort, 35 patients (67%) participated in competitive, varsity, or elite martial arts prior to injury. Of those who did not return to martial arts at all, fear of reinjury was the most common reason. The rate of RTPS was 58%. Age, pre-injury martial arts participation (frequency and competitiveness), and surgical characteristics did not differ between groups. Those who did not achieve RTPS had a higher rate of minor and major postoperative complication (41% vs. 13%, Conclusion: Martial arts athletes demonstrated a rate of 58% return to pre-injury participation levels after ACLR. Level of evidence: Case series; level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.