ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Anatomical landmarks are more accurate in identifying the ideal femoral insertion for modified Larson reconstruction of posterolateral corner than radiological landmarks.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anatomical landmarks are more accurate in identifying the ideal femoral insertion for modified Larson reconstruction of posterolateral corner than radiological landmarks.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In surgery for posterolateral knee instabilities, the modified Larson technique (MLT) is a fibular tunnel-based reconstruction technique with a single femoral tunnel aiming for an isometric graft insertion point (IGIP). The IGIP can be located intraoperatively using an anatomically referenced method (ARM) or a radiological method (RM). The purpose of this experimental study was to compare the ARM with the RM in terms of isometric behaviour and to report the location of the ARM and RM in relation to the lateral epicondyle (LE). Methods: Flexion/extension movement of eight fresh-frozen human knee joints was simulated in a custom-made knee test bench. A fibular tunnel was created as described in the MLT, and a suture was shuttled from the IGIP through the tunnel and connected to a displacement transducer. The isometry of the IGIP of the ARM and RM was evaluated on the basis of suture displacement during flexion/extension motion. The position of the determined IGIP relative to the centre of the LE was measured on true lateral X-rays. Results: Comparison of the isometry behaviour of the two techniques showed that RM resulted in a displacement of 10.46 ± 3.69 mm, whereas the ARM showed a of 6.09 ± 2.11 mm during flexion/extension motion ( Conclusions: In the present in vitro experiment, the ARM was capable of determining the femoral IGIP more accurately than the radiological method. For clinical practice, it is recommended to start approximately 6.5 mm distal and 3.95 mm anterior to the centre of the LE in order to determine the IGIP when performing MLT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.