ArticleJBMR plus2025
Osseous morphology differences in the foot and ankle associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
Article in JBMR plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asymmetric Cavovarus Deformity Presentation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Statistical Shape Modeling Characterization of Cavovarus Deformity Between Demyelinating and Axonal Subtypes of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.Foot & ankle international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is a genetic, progressive peripheral nerve disease that commonly manifests in a cavovarus foot deformity. Previously, this foot deformity has been believed to be an alignment change in the foot, but recent research has shown that there are bone morphology differences in individuals with CMT. Differences in bone morphology have been identified in the calcaneus, talus, and medial cuneiform, but have not been consistently analyzed throughout the foot or studied in relation to different genetic subtypes of CMT. This study is a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of bone morphology in CMT using weight-bearing computed tomography and statistical shape modeling. This analysis identified bone morphology differences between CMT and control groups throughout the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. Bone morphology differences were also present between the 2 primary disease subtypes throughout the foot. Key morphologic findings include the altered shape of the subtalar articular surfaces on the talus, bending of the metatarsals, variation in navicular process morphology, and differences between subtypes in the talus, medial cuneiform, and medial metatarsals. There are several possible theoretical mechanisms for this osseous deformation, including bone remodeling in response to altered loading from alignment change or from decreased musculotendinous forces, but the patterns of morphological variation seen in these data cannot be fully explained by these mechanisms, suggesting that there may be an interaction between the neuronal disease and bone remodeling. Future work is necessary to characterize the progression of bony deformity throughout development and to correlate bone shape with function, gait, muscle morphology and strength to elucidate the mechanism of osseous morphology change in varying subtypes of CMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.