ArticleJBMR plus2025
Real-world differences in denosumab persistence, reinitiation, and switching among cohorts of older adults in Canada and the United States.
Article in JBMR plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Endocrine reviews · 2026Review
- Letter comments on: a programmatic approach to osteoporosis treatment: insight from a 20-year longitudinal study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Follow-on osteoporosis therapy after denosumab discontinuation among Medicare beneficiaries.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- The relationship between osteoporosis treatment history and receipt of a second zoledronic acid dose.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Denosumab is an injectable osteoporosis medication administered twice per year. Discontinuation of denosumab can result in rapid rebound fractures, but the evidence is limited on real-world persistence with denosumab. We conducted 2 parallel, population-based cohort studies leveraging (1) healthcare administrative data from Ontario, Canada (ON; 100% population) and (2) a 20% random sample of US Medicare beneficiaries (US). The first denosumab claim (US: 1/2010-12/2019; ON: 1/2012-12/2021) was identified using pharmacy claims (ON) and Medicare Parts D and B claims (US). Patients aged <66 yr, residing in long-term care (LTC), or with implausible data (eg, death before first claim) were excluded. We developed and applied an algorithm that used dosing and days between dispensations to clean denosumab claims. We assumed a days supply of 183 d for each dispensation and defined discontinuation as a 60-d gap in coverage. We estimated initial persistence, reinitiation, and switching to other osteoporosis medications using Kaplan-Meier estimators, censoring on death, disenrollment (US only), LTC admission, or study end (12/31/2022 [ON], 12/31/2020 [US]). We also estimated the monthly proportion of patients with an on-time denosumab dose to explore time trends. We identified 168 339 eligible individuals in ON (mean age = 78 yr; 90% female) and 97 595 in the US (mean age = 77 yr; 90% female). In ON, the median time to denosumab discontinuation was longer (median 2.3 yr [ON] vs 1.7 yr [US]; 3-yr persistence: 44% [ON] vs 31% [US]), and time to reinitiation was shorter (median = 0.5 yr [ON] vs 1.9 yr [US]). In both populations, around 10% switched to another osteoporosis medication. Women and those with prior oral bisphosphonate use had longer durations of denosumab treatment in ON but not in the US. The proportion persisting with on-time doses did not increase over time in the US or ON. Research to improve persistence with denosumab and optimize post-denosumab treatment is critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.