Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390798›Full record

ReviewSubstance abuse and rehabilitation2025

Hybrid Virtual Group Model for Substance Use Disorder Therapy: A Scoping Review.

Edward A Trimble, Nicholas L Bormann, Alyssa H Kalata, Dana Gerberi, Stephan Arndt, Tyler S Oesterle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edward A TrimbleMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-6120-0459
Nicholas L BormannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8847-8727
Alyssa H KalataDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-7008-2407
Dana GerberiMayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1522-3915
Stephan ArndtDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Tyler S OesterleDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7363-8086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Substance use disorder (SUD) group therapy has traditionally been conducted in-person; however, there is growing interest in virtual formats. While virtual group therapy can address certain barriers for in-person attendance, it may compromise key elements like therapeutic alliance and group cohesiveness. A model that integrates both in-person and virtual participants may help balance the benefits of these two approaches. Objective: To identify and define approaches to SUD group therapy that integrate in-person and virtual participants, summarize study outcomes associated with these models, propose standardized terminology, and provide preliminary recommendations for their application in SUD treatment. Design: A comprehensive search was conducted on 11/13/2024 and updated on 12/16/2024 by a medical librarian. Included articles were published 2000 onwards and conducted with SUD group therapy where participants or group facilitators were both in-person and virtual. We extracted data from 4 articles that met the search criteria. Results: A total of 1353 articles were screened, 20 were evaluated at the full-text level, and 4 met study inclusion criteria. Two "hybrid" model designs for SUD were identified. One model utilized a virtual group facilitator, while participants remained together in-person. The second model kept the facilitator in-person and allowed group participants to be present either virtually or in-person within the same group. Outcomes evaluated included treatment completion across groups and patient perceived changes in therapeutic alliance, group cohesion, and understanding of addiction. Conclusion: We propose a consensus definition of hybrid virtual group models where at least one group member, either the facilitator or one of the participants, attends groups in-person while at least one member attends virtually. While research is limited, early findings suggest that hybrid SUD groups have similar outcomes to in-person groups and better outcomes than virtual-only groups. Unique considerations should be made to ensure that hybrid SUD models are implemented appropriately and effectively.

Indexed as

addictionteleconferencingtelehealthtreatment delivery

Identifiers

PMID40390798
PMCPMC12086859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.