ArticleCureus2025
Functional Outcomes of Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes of Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Fixation of Humerus Shaft Fractures: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Advances in orthopedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Humeral shaft fractures were frequent orthopedic injuries, typically caused by trauma, and the optimal treatment approach remained a subject of discussion. Intramedullary interlocking (IMIL) nailing was a minimally invasive surgical method that offered superior biomechanical stability, especially for diaphyseal fractures, while promoting early mobilization. This prospective study assessed the functional outcomes of IMIL nailing in managing humeral shaft fractures. Objectives This study aims to evaluate the functional outcomes of IMIL nails in treating closed humeral shaft fractures and to analyze common complications associated with humeral nailing, including non-union rates, infection, shoulder impingement, and the necessity for secondary procedures. Materials and methods We included 40 cases of humeral shaft fractures managed with IMIL nails. Patients were followed for a minimum of six months. The inclusion criteria included individuals aged 18 to 70 with closed or segmental fractures. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, while radiological union, intraoperative findings, and complications were recorded. Results Fracture union was achieved in 38 (95%) patients, with an average healing time of 10 to 16 weeks. At the final follow-up, the mean DASH score was 16.51, reflecting satisfactory arm, elbow, and shoulder function. Among the 40 cases, six (15%) demonstrated excellent functional outcomes, 26 (65%) had good results, six (15%) showed fair outcomes, and two (5%) experienced poor results, requiring secondary procedures to achieve union. Conclusion IMIL nailing was a reliable and effective method for managing humeral shaft fractures, providing excellent functional recovery, a high fracture healing rate, and manageable complications. Its advantages included early mobilization and minimal surgical morbidity, making it a viable treatment choice. The procedure led to significant functional improvement, as demonstrated by enhanced DASH scores at six months, underscoring its effectiveness as a minimally invasive approach with favorable long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.