Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390750›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Spinal Schwannoma Missed on Chest MRI: A Case of Diagnostic Oversight Prevented by Clinical Re-evaluation.

Kouichi Asahi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kouichi AsahiInternal Medicine and Pediatrics, Kohokuekimae Ohisama Clinic, Tokyo, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal schwannomas are benign tumors that can cause significant morbidity if undiagnosed. Misdiagnosis may occur when imaging has a narrow field of view (FOV), especially if clinicians overly rely on radiology interpretations without correlating clinical findings. Here, we report a case of a 58-year-old man who presented with chronic chest and back pain initially attributed to musculoskeletal causes. A non-contrast chest MRI from another hospital was reported as normal. Upon presentation, neurological findings revealed sensory deficits over thoracic dermatomes. The attending physician, board-certified in both general internal medicine and diagnostic radiology, identified a subtle lesion at the edge of the original imaging field. A dedicated contrast-enhanced thoracic spine MRI revealed a tumor consistent with spinal schwannoma at the T7 level. Surgical resection resulted in complete symptom resolution. This case highlights how clinical re-evaluation and imaging reassessment can prevent diagnostic errors associated with a limited FOV and cognitive biases.

Indexed as

clinical re-evaluationdiagnostic errorfield of view (fov) limitationmri interpretationspinal schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID40390750
PMCPMC12087258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.