Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390727›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Topical Tacrolimus in the Management of High-Risk Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abdulmajeed Al Khathami, Ruba A Alamri, Reem A Garah, Rawan S Alsamli, Nourah B Alsheikh, Omar B Alsheikh Alshahrani, Yazeed S AlHoshan, Sarah M Alaklabi, Shaima A Benyh, Abdulrahman Alamri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdulmajeed Al KhathamiDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Fahad Hospital, Al Baha Health Cluster, Al Baha, SAU.
Ruba A AlamriMedicine and Surgery, Taibah University, Medina, SAU.
Reem A GarahCollege of Medicine, Taibah University, Al Madinah Al Monawarah, SAU.
Rawan S AlsamliCollege of Medicine and Surgery, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.
Nourah B AlsheikhCollege of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, SAU.
Omar B Alsheikh AlshahraniCollege of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, SAU.
Yazeed S AlHoshanCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Sarah M AlaklabiCollege of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, SAU.
Shaima A BenyhCollege of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, SAU.
Abdulrahman AlamriOphthalmology, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal transplantation is a frequently performed procedure for human eye transplants. In low-risk conditions such as keratoconus and Fuch's dystrophy, corneal transplantation has a high success rate due to the immune advantages in support of the cornea. Major risk factors for corneal graft rejection include: atopy, chemical burn, prolonged herpes infection, infectious leukoma, trauma, prior transplantation, active inflammation, and corneal neovascularization. Treatments against lymphangiogenic bacteria and anti-angiogenic bacteria are two strategies to reduce corneal graft rejection. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess topical tacrolimus's benefits for high-risk keratoplasty management. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, data was gathered by combining pertinent medical subject words in the literature of the complementing articles from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, and Google Scholar. The search was conducted using terms such as "tacrolimus," "keratoplasty," and other related synonymous terms. Prior to conducting a meta-analysis, Review Manager version 5.3.2 (www.revman.cochrane.org) was utilized to assess the risk of bias in the extracted data, and the literature was chosen according to pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The meta-analysis employed both Forest plots and funnel plots to examine heterogeneity and assess the likelihood of publication bias. Eight studies were included in the analysis. The results indicated a moderate level of heterogeneity among the included studies, with Tau2 = 0.19 and I2 = 52%. Moreover, the overall findings suggested that topical tacrolimus treatment emerged as the most effective medication for high-risk keratoplasty, as evidenced by the diamond marker positioned slightly to the left side of the 95% confidence interval (0.67; 0.42-1.06), rather than the right side. Subgroup analysis further reinforced this notion, showing that topical tacrolimus was particularly efficacious in treating high-risk keratoplasty, with a 95% confidence interval of (0.16; -0.68-1.00). However, the difference observed was minimal, possibly due to certain studies comparing topical tacrolimus with mixed treatment doses, some of which included a combination of tacrolimus and other agents. Additionally, topical tacrolimus treatment was identified as the safest option for high-risk keratoplasty, with a confidence interval of (-0.35; -2.23-0.88). Nonetheless, the overall effect suggested that the medication did not significantly differ from other treatments. This study confirms that topical tacrolimus is both effective and the safest treatment for managing high-risk penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). However, future studies should focus on determining the appropriate dosage levels for the management of high-risk PKP.

Indexed as

corneal transplantationhigh-risk keratoplastysystematic review and meta-analysistacrolimustherapeutic penetrating keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID40390727
PMCPMC12087805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.