ReviewCureus2025
Investigating the Feasibility and Safety of Osseointegration With Neural Interfaces for Advanced Prosthetic Control.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Upper limb prostheses: a narrative review of hand, wrist, and elbow devices.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osseointegrated neural interfaces (ONI), particularly in conjunction with peripheral nerve interfaces (PNIs), have emerged as a promising advancement for intuitive neuroprosthetics. PNIs can decode neural signals and allow precise prosthetic movement control and bidirectional communication for haptic feedback, while osseointegration can address limitations of traditional socket-based prosthetics, such as poor stability, limited dexterity, and lack of sensory feedback. This review explores advancements in ONIs, including screw-fit and press-fit systems and their integration with PNIs for bidirectional communication. ONIs integrated with PNIs (OIPNIs) have shown improvements in signal fidelity, motor control, and sensory feedback compared to popular surface electromyography (sEMG) systems. Additionally, emerging technologies such as hybrid electrode designs (e.g., cuff and sieve electrode (CASE)) and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) show potential for enhancing selectivity and reducing complications such as micromotion and scarring. Despite these advances, challenges remain, including infection risk, electrode degradation, and variability in long-term signal stability. Osseointegration combined with advanced neural interfaces represents a transformative approach to prosthetic control, offering more natural and intuitive movement with sensory feedback. Further research is needed to address long-term biocompatibility, reduce surgical invasiveness, and explore emerging technologies such as machine learning for personalized ONI designs. The findings of this review underscore the potential of ONIs to enhance embodiment and quality of life for amputees and highlight current pitfalls and possible areas of improvement and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.