ArticleInternational health2026
Understanding contraception-use intentions among women of reproductive age not currently using contraceptives in sub-Saharan Africa: key insights from Demographic and Health Surveys.
Article in International health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community-level variations in contraceptive use among women in union and those not in union: a comparative study of 35 sub-Saharan African countries.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- High-risk fertility behavior among reproductive age women in extremely high and very high maternal mortality sub-Saharan African countries.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Article
- Impact of FP2020 Program on High-Risk Pregnancies and Under-Five Mortality in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Analysis Using Demographic and Health Surveys (2013-2023).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study assesses the prevalence of contraception-use intentions and evaluates the associated factors among non-users in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).
methodsData from 2014-2023 Demographic and Health Surveys of 30 countries in SSA consisting of 332 986 women aged 15-49 y not already using contraception were used.
resultsThe overall prevalence was 41.18% (95% CI 41.01 to 41.34%). Zimbabwe had the highest prevalence (72.34%; 95% CI 71.11 to 73.57%), whereas Ethiopia had the lowest (15.96%; 95% CI 15.40 to 16.51%). Women aged 25-49 y had lower odds of intending to use contraception compared with those aged 15-19 y, and this was striking among those aged 45-49 y (adjusted OR [AOR]=0.06, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.07). Those with a higher level of education displayed a greater likelihood of intending to use contraception (AOR=1.93, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.05) compared with those with no education. The odds increased with the number of children born, particularly for those with ≥4 children (AOR=1.59, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.67) compared with those with no children.
conclusionsPromoting the use of contraception requires tailored, multi-pronged interventions that account for the diverse sociodemographic, fertility and informational needs of women in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.