ArticleMedical education2026
Silent teachers: Narratives from the simulation lab.
Article in Medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Silent teachers: Narratives from the simulation lab.Medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient mannequins are ubiquitous in simulation-based medical education, yet their own 'stories' remain untold. This paper adopts a playful, phenomenological lens, amplified by artificial intelligence (AI), to explore the fictional 'lived experiences' of these silent teachers and reflect on their pedagogical significance.
methodsFictional narratives were generated for three representative mannequins - Mr. Heart Attack, Mrs. Difficult Birth and a composite 'Geriatric Triplet' representing common geriatric syndromes - using a large language model (ChatGPT 4.0). These narratives were analysed using qualitative methods (narrative inquiry, phenomenology, content analysis) to explore their 'experiences' and pedagogical roles.
resultsThe AI-generated narratives depicted mannequins possessing distinct 'personalities' and reflections on their roles (e.g., Mr. Heart Attack's resignation, the Triplets' patience). They highlighted key learning opportunities, such as managing clinical uncertainty (Mr. Heart Attack), holistic care (Triplets) and navigating high-stakes emotional scenarios (Mrs. Difficult Birth). Themes emerged around clinical decision-making, teamwork, communication and empathy.
conclusionThis playful yet reflective study highlights mannequins as more than inert tools, using their AI-generated 'voices' to underscore key simulation principles. It also demonstrates a novel methodological approach, prompting reflection on narrative, perspective and the potential roles of AI in shaping educational discourse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.