ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Disturbance-Aware On-Chip Training with Mitigation Schemes for Massively Parallel Computing in Analog Deep Learning Accelerator.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disturbance-Aware On-Chip Training with Mitigation Schemes for Massively Parallel Computing in Analog Deep Learning Accelerator.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
On-chip training in analog in-memory computing (AIMC) holds great promise for reducing data latency and enabling user-specific learning. However, analog synaptic devices face significant challenges, particularly during parallel weight updates in crossbar arrays, where non-uniform programming and disturbances often arise. Despite their importance, the disturbances that occur during training are difficult to quantify based on a clear mechanism, and as a result, their impact on training performance remains underexplored. This work precisely identifies and quantifies the disturbance effects in 6T1C synaptic devices based on oxide semiconductors and capacitors, whose endurance and variation have been validated but encounter worsening disturbance effects with device scaling. By clarifying the disturbance mechanism, three simple operational schemes are proposed to mitigate these effects, with their efficacy validated through device array measurements. Furthermore, to evaluate learning feasibility in large-scale arrays, real-time disturbance-aware training simulations are conducted by mapping synaptic arrays to convolutional neural networks for the CIFAR-10 dataset. A software-equivalent accuracy is achieved even under intensified disturbances, using a cell capacitor size of 50fF, comparable to dynamic random-access memory. Combined with the inherent advantages of endurance and variation, this approach offers a practical solution for hardware-based deep learning based on the 6T1C synaptic array.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.