ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2025
Identification of key biomarker genes in liver hepatocellular carcinoma and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma progression: A shared high-throughput screening and molecular docking method with potentials for targeted therapeutic interventions.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- NDC80 promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through macrophages polarization and PI3K/AKT pathway activation.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesLiver Hepatocellular Carcinoma (LIHC) and Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma (KIRC) are leading causes of cancer death worldwide, but their early detections remain hindered by a lack of genetic markers. Our study aims to find prospective biomarkers that could serve as prognostic indicators for efficient drug candidates for KIRC and LIHC treatment.
methodsTo detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs), four datasets were used: GSE66271 and GSE213324 for KIRC, and GSE135631 and GSE202853 for LIHC. Visualization of DEGs was done using heatmaps, volcano plots, and Venn diagrams. Hub genes were identified via PPI analysis and the cytoHubba plugin in Cytoscape. Their expression was evaluated using box plots, stage plots, and survival plots for prognostic assessment via GEPIA2. Molecular docking with PyRx's AutoDock Vina identified optimal binding interactions between compounds and proteins. Pharmacokinetic and toxicity analyses reinforced the drug-likeness and safety of these compounds.
resultsIn this study, 47 DEGs were identified, with the top 10 hub genes being TOP2A, BUB1, PTTG1, CCNB2, NUSAP1, KIF20A, BIRC5, RRM2, NDC80 and CDC45, chosen for their high MCC scores. Data mining revealed a correlation between TOP2A expression and clinical survival outcomes in KIRC and LIHC patients. Docking studies of the TOP2A structure identified a promising compound from Andrographis paniculata with high binding energy and interactions with TOP2A. Pharmacokinetic and toxicity assessments support its potential as a drug candidate.
conclusionOur study emphasizes TOP2A's prognostic significance in KIRC and LIHC and recognizes Andrographis paniculata compound as potential therapeutics, offering prospective for enhanced treatment and patient outcomes in these cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.