Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390332›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2025

Feasibility and acceptability of peer-delivered HIV and syphilis self-test kits and assisted partner notification services for gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: a qualitative study in Uganda.

Stephen Okoboi, Andrew Mujugira, Deborah Ekusai-Sebatta, Adeline Twimukye, Peninah Tumuhimbise, Brian Aliganyira, Barbara Castelnuovo, Rachel King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephen OkoboiInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8738-0397
Andrew MujugiraInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6646-6733
Deborah Ekusai-SebattaInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Adeline TwimukyeInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Peninah TumuhimbiseArk Wellness Hub, Kampala, Uganda.
Brian AliganyiraArk Wellness Hub, Kampala, Uganda.
Barbara CastelnuovoInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Rachel KingDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

Peer delivered HIV/syphilis self-testing with assisted partner notification services for men who have sex with men (MSM) in UgandaK43TW012637 · FIC · INFECTIOUS DISEASES INSTITUTE · PI Stephen Okoboi · 2023 to 2026
$439k
FIC NIH HHS K43 TW012637FIC NIH HHS K43TW012637NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a need to combine different approaches to tackle the HIV epidemic, particularly in high-incidence populations. We explored the feasibility and acceptability of using peer-delivered HIV self-testing (HIVST), syphilis self-testing (SST) and assisted partner notification (APN) services among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in Uganda.

methodsFrom November 2023 to March 2024, we conducted in-depth interviews with 20 purposively selected GBMSM peers and 10 healthcare workers (HCWs). The GBMSM and HCWs interviews explored their perspectives on (1) the feasibility, acceptability and preferences for peer-delivered interventions (HIVST, SST and APN) and (2) strategies and methods of reaching individuals who had not been tested or tested more than 6 months before the interview. We used a content analysis approach to define and organize codes deductively and inductively to identify themes.

resultsThe median age of the 20 GBMSM peers was 27 years (interquartile range [IQR], 22-35 years), and 37 years (IQR, 25-52) for the 10 HCWs, of whom seven were female. We identified four emerging categories: (1) Trust: GBMSM peers and HCWs expressed trust in the peer delivery of self-test kits (HIVST and SST) to obtain same-day results effectively. HCWs were preferred over peers for APN services in reaching sexual contacts of index clients for testing; (2) Intimate partner violence (IPV): Although initial concerns about IPV were raised concerning both HIVST programmes and peer APN strategies, such incidents were rarely reported in practice; (3) Entry point: Similar to HIVST, SST was a self-administered activity that served as an entry point for HIV testing discussions among GBMSM who had either never undergone or had postponed testing. Self-test kits could also facilitate pre-sexual testing among GBMSM; (4) Social media: Campaigns on social media dedicated to promoting self-testing could expand testing coverage services to GBMSM vulnerable to HIV and syphilis acquisition.

conclusionsHCWs and GBMSM peers preferred delivery of self-test kits through peers over facility-based approaches; however, they favoured HCWs for providing APN services. Integrating peer-delivered self-testing programmes into differentiated testing models and leveraging social media influencers could expand testing coverage among GBMSM.

Indexed as

Contact TracingHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf-TestingSexual and Gender MinoritiesSyphilisAdultFeasibility StudiesHumansMalePeer GroupQualitative ResearchReagent Kits, DiagnosticUgandaYoung AdultReagent Kits, Diagnosticassisted partner notificationGBMSMhealthcare workersHIV self‐testingsyphilis self‐testingUganda

Identifiers

PMID40390332
PMCPMC12089651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.