ArticleNutrition bulletin2025
Is There a Specific Role for Fungal Protein Within Food Based Dietary Guidelines? A Roundtable Discussion.
Article in Nutrition bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From the bench to the reactor: engineered filamentous fungi for biochemical and biomaterial production.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Expanding and aging populations, sustainability drivers and changing attitudes to the way we eat mean that there has been growing interest in non-animal derived protein food sources. Given this shift, there has been an uprise in consumer demand and commercial innovation of meat analogues and alternative protein food sources. The question, with a focus on fungal proteins, is where to best place them within Food-based Dietary Guidelines? A Nutrition Society Member-Led meeting was convened as a roundtable on 12th February 2024 to gather views on whether there is a specific role for fungal protein within Food-based Dietary Guidelines and how this role is best communicated. The intention of the roundtable was to establish areas of consensus or any disparities, and pinpoint future research directions. The roundtable format included three contextual presentations followed by discussions around seven core statements. A group of 11 experts from academia, policymaking and industry participated. There was agreement that health and sustainability research had advanced (for mycoprotein in particular). Subsequently, there is no reason to exclude fungal-derived proteins from Food-based Dietary Guidelines. The panel agreed on the need for an updated database on mycoprotein intakes in different countries along with long-term population studies comparing fungal, plant and meat sources against health and sustainability outcomes. The consensus was that fungal-derived mycoprotein could be represented within Food-based Dietary Guidelines, within a 'non-animal/non-meat' or 'other protein' sector, or as part of a generic protein diversification message.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.