ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2025
Crossbow impact effect on clothing and potential associated injuries.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Crossbow impact effect on clothing and potential associated injuries.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been an increase in crossbow use for hunting practices, sport target shooting, and criminal activity. In the UK, there is minimal legislation surrounding the crossbow. UK law states individuals must be over 18 to buy or possess a crossbow. To date, little experimental research has been conducted, with most of the research focusing on injuries resulting from crossbow incidents. The aim of this study was to ascertain what effect crossbow bolts would have against ordinary clothing worn by the public and how or if different combinations of clothing would fare differently against the bolts and if that could be of use to the forensic examiner. An 80 lb. Armex tomcat II crossbow was used with three types of clothing used in four combinations, along with a non-clothed gelatine block. The results showed that all 10 bolts penetrated the non-clothed gelatine block, T-shirt, and polo shirt series, while nine bolts penetrated the hoodie/T-shirt combination and only three penetrated the hoodie/polo shirt combination. Significant differences were highlighted between the mean penetration depths of the non-clothed gelatine block and each clothing series, with the highest observed value being the thickest layer combination. Inspections of bolts and wound tracts revealed the presence of clothing fibers. The conclusions of this study demonstrated that this information can be utilized by forensic investigators and medical professionals as a source of trace evidence. Further research into crossbow effects on clothing would prove beneficial to increase the understanding of how the crossbow reacts with the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.