ArticleJournal of medical case reports2025
Ureterovaginal fistula after hysterectomy with double-J stent misplacement into the inferior vena cava: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDouble-J stent placement is a common and generally safe procedure in urology. However, rare complications such as stent misplacement into vascular structures can occur, posing significant risks. The case presented herein highlights an exceedingly rare complication of stent misplacement into the inferior vena cava during the management of a vesicovaginal fistula, emphasizing the importance of prompt recognition and multidisciplinary intervention. CASE PRESENTATION: In February 2023, a 48-year-old Iranian woman with history of total abdominal hysterectomy presented with complaints of watery vaginal discharge 1 month postoperatively. She was diagnosed with a vesicovaginal fistula and underwent cystoscopy, ureteroscopy, and attempted placement of a double-J stent. Intraoperatively, the stent was found to be misplaced in the suprarenal segment of the inferior vena cava, near the right atrium, as confirmed by postoperative imaging. The patient subsequently underwent laparotomy for stent removal and ureteral reimplantation. A multidisciplinary surgical team, including vascular surgeons, participated in the procedure to mitigate potential complications. The stent was successfully removed via ureteroscopy without complications, and the ureter was reconnected to the bladder. The patient was followed up for 3 months after stent removal. She remained asymptomatic, with no recurrence of urinary leakage, ureteral obstruction, or thrombotic complications. Follow-up imaging confirmed proper ureteral healing and the absence of any further stent migration. At the final follow-up, the patient reported full recovery with no discomfort or residual symptoms. Written informed consent for publication of this case and accompanying images was obtained from both the patient and the hospital's ethics committee.
conclusionThis case demonstrates the need for vigilance during stent placement, particularly in patients with altered anatomy. It also underscores the value of timely imaging to identify complications and the importance of a multidisciplinary surgical approach in ensuring successful outcomes. The report contributes to the literature on managing rare urological complications and highlights the role of advanced endoscopic and surgical techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.