Trial reportHereditas2025
Efficacy of red ointment in wound cavity repair following non-puerperal mastitis debridement.
Trial report in Hereditas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Traditional Chinese medicine and plant-derived bioactive compounds as sustainable alternatives to antibiotics in bovine mastitis: a review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of red ointment, a widely used topical agent in traditional Chinese medicine, in promoting wound cavity repair following debridement for non-puerperal mastitis (NPM).
methodsA prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted, including 88 patients diagnosed with NPM. Patients were randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the control group. All patients underwent debridement during the acute inflammatory phase. Postoperatively, the treatment group received daily dressing changes using sterile gauze strips infused with red ointment, whereas the control group received sterile gauze strips soaked in rivanol. The effectiveness of treatment was assessed after two weeks by evaluating the total effective rate, wound cavity score, symptom and sign score, laboratory parameters, and adverse events.
resultsIn the intention to treat analysis, the total effective rate was 90.9% in the red ointment group, which was higher than the 86.4% observed in the rivanol group. In the per protocol analysis, the total effective rate was 97.6% in the red ointment group, exceeding the 92.7% in the rivanol group. Compared with rivanol-treated gauze strips, the use of red ointment gauze strips resulted in a significantly greater reduction in wound cavity volume (p < 0.05), improved local breast symptoms (p < 0.05), and a lower wound cavity score (p < 0.001). Granulation tissue in the red ointment group exhibited a significantly fresher color compared to the rivanol group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding adverse effects on hepatic and renal function following treatment.
conclusionThe use of red ointment gauze strips for wound cavity filling following NPM debridement demonstrated favorable clinical efficacy and safety, providing a viable option for postoperative drainage management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.