Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390135›Full record

ReviewLaboratory animal research2025

Ventilator-induced lung injury in rat models: are they all equal in the race?

Jon Petur Joelsson, Sigurbergur Karason

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laboratory animal research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jon Petur JoelssonUniversity of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. jpj@hi.is.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3261-4504
Sigurbergur KarasonUniversity of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Funding

University of Iceland Post Doctoral Grant 1600-16104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is an inevitable and precarious accompaniment of ventilator treatment in critically ill patients worldwide. It can both instigate and aggravate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) where the only prevention or treatment so far has been empirical approach of what is considered to be lung protective ventilator settings in an attempt to shield the lung tissues against the mechanical stress that unavoidably follows ventilator treatment. The weakened state of the patients limits clinical drug research and pushes for drug discovery in animal models. Mice and rats are often the choice of small animal model, representing about 95% of all laboratory animal studies, as their physiology can mimic that which is found in humans. Mice have been a more popular choice for ventilator studies but due to technical issues, there is some advantage gained in using rats as they are substantially larger. Inducing VILI and ARDS in these models can prove challenging and often the acute nature of the injury used to produce similar tissue damage as in humans does not necessarily fully reflect clinical reality. The aim of this review was to analyse and summarize methods of recent publications in the field, describing what approaches have been utilized to simulate these conditions, possibly identifying a common track enabling comparison of results between studies. However, the study shows a high variety of methods employed by researchers causing comparisons of results difficult and perhaps implying that a more standardized approach should be used.

Indexed as

ARDSMechanical ventilationRat modelsVILI

Identifiers

PMID40390135
PMCPMC12090643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.