Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390116›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2025

Health inequalities in disease burden of dementia and early-onset dementia: findings from the Global Burden of Disease 2021 study.

Min Du, Lu Gram, Fude Yang, Donghua Mi, Hongguang Chen, Chao Song, Min Liu, Jue Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Min DuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Lu GramInstitute for Global Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Fude YangPeking University HuiLongGuan Clinical Medical School, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, No. 29, Huilongnan Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102208, China.
Donghua MiChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.6 Tiantan Xili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Hongguang ChenPeking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health, No. 51 Huayuanbei Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Chao SongKunming University of Science and Technology, Anning First People's Hospital, No. 727 South Jingming Road, Chenggong District, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
Min LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jue LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. jueliu@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1938-9365

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72122001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the increasing aging global population and advancements in dementia action plans, the latest disparities in the dementia burden may evolve. This study aimed to analyze and compare temporal trends at regional, national, and sociodemographic levels to provide evidence for public health planning and resource prioritization.

methodsThe age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR), age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR), age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), and age-standardized disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) rate (ASDR) were derived from the Global Burden of Disease 2021 study. Estimated annual percentage changes (EAPCs) were calculated to quantify their temporal trends. Correlations between EAPC and the human resources for health (HRH) were assessed using Pearson correlation analysis.

resultsAlthough the ASPR and ASIR remained stable or decreased globally, they both greatly increased in East Asia (ASPR: EAPC = 0.43; 95% CI 0.35, 0.51; ASIR: EAPC = 0.40; 95% CI 0.33, 0.47). For early-onset dementia, the ASPR (range of EAPC = 0.03-0.17) and ASIR (range of EAPC = 0.05-0.19) in the 45 to 59 years age group increased in North Africa and Middle East, particularly among females (ASPR: range of EAPC = 0.08-0.21; ASIR: range of EAPC = 0.09-0.2). Although the ASMR and ASDR both decreased globally and in high socio-demographic index region, they both increased greatly in South Asia (ASMR: EAPC = 0.7; 95% CI 0.66, 0.75; ASDR: EAPC = 0.40; 95% CI 0.37, 0.43). For early-onset dementia, the ASMR (range of EAPC = 0.43-0.78) and ASDR (range of EAPC = 0.19-0.33) in the 40 to 59 years age group had increased in Central Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly among females (ASMR: range of EAPC = 0.5-0.86; ASDR: range of EAPC = 0.19-0.4). Negative correlations were observed between the EAPC in ASPR, ASIR, ASMR and ASDR with various types of HRH at the national level.

conclusionsAlthough there has been progresses in controlling the global trends of dementia incidence, prevalence, and mortality, significant regional and national inequalities remain evident. More importantly, the early-onset dementia burden is increasing significantly among females in the African region, underscoring the critical need for healthcare systems that address dementia across the early midlife span.

Indexed as

DementiaGlobal Burden of DiseaseHealth Status DisparitiesAdultAgedAge of OnsetCost of IllnessDisability-Adjusted Life YearsFemaleGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSocioeconomic FactorsDementiaEarly-onsetHealth disparitiesIncidenceMortality

Identifiers

PMID40390116
PMCPMC12087054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.