ReviewJournal of eating disorders2025
Service models in eating disorders: a scoping review.
Review in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-home medical nutrition support for patients with severe anorexia nervosa: a mixed methods evaluation of a specialized Mobile Nutrition Team.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Clinician's Experience of Working with an Intensive Outpatient Programme for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders-A Reflexive Thematic Analysis.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Self-reported interoceptive sensibility across eating disorder symptoms: associations with sociodemographic factors.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Bridging the gaps in eating disorder care: a systematic and comparative review of guidelines for prevention, early intervention, and service delivery.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe complexity of eating disorders can be reflected in the different diagnoses, varied clinical presentations and diverse personal circumstances of people living with an eating disorder. Given this complexity, adaptable and flexible service models are essential for effective care. Service models outline a structure for health care delivery that targets the health-related needs of people. The characteristics of existing service models providing assessment and treatment for eating disorders are not well described or understood.
objectiveThe purpose of this scoping review was to map and describe the different types of service models for eating disorders and their characteristics.
methodThe JBI methodology for scoping reviews was used. A search of four databases (MEDLINE Complete, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL) and grey literature was conducted. Sources describing service models supporting individuals with eating disorders were included.
resultsAfter duplicates were removed, the remaining sources were screened and read in full, and 30 sources were included in the review. Most service models were eating disorder specialist, located in metropolitan areas and based in community settings. Key characteristics of eating disorder service models included person-centred care, involvement of family and carers, co-design and lived experience contribution, multidisciplinary team, accessibility, identification and management of co-occurring conditions and integration with broader service systems.
conclusionFindings indicate vast differences between service models for eating disorders. However, there are examples of innovative and effective service models that show promise. The characteristics of service models for eating disorders identified in this review provided insight into what constitutes an effective and high-quality service model in the sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.