ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2025
The effects of intrathecal fentanyl on postoperative opioid utilization rates in elderly patients undergoing lower extremity orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious types of lower extremity orthopedic surgeries can cause severe postoperative pain in elderly patients. Achieving adequate pain control while minimizing the use of opioids is advantageous, as it helps reduce postoperative complications and facilitates recovery. In this randomized trial, we compared the opioid utilization rates of elderly patients who received or not receive intrathecal fentanyl as an anesthesia adjuvant.
methodsA total of 180 elderly patients were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to the BF1 group (bupivacaine plus 25 µg of fentanyl), the BF2 group (bupivacaine plus 50 µg of fentanyl), or the B group (bupivacaine), achieving a final between-group ratio of 2:2:1. Our primary outcome was the rate of opioid use, while secondary outcomes included the NRS score and the utilization rate of analgesic drugs on PODS1-3.
resultsThe usage rate of opioid analgesics within the POD3 was higher in B group compared to BF1 and BF2 groups (100% vs. 79.2% and 80.3%, respectively; P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the usage rate of opioid analgesics among the groups within the PODS1-2 (P > 0.05). The incidence of patients with NRS scores ≥ 4 was significantly lower in BF1 and BF2 groups compared to B group on PODS2-3 (POD2, 62.2% and 68.9% vs. 93.8%, respectively; P < 0.05; POD3, 16.2% and 17.6% vs. 40.6%, respectively; P < 0.05). Additionally, BF1 group had a lower incidence of NRS scores ≥ 4 compared to B group on POD1 (P < 0.05). The rate of analgesic drug use was similar among the three groups on POD1-3 (P > 0.05).
conclusionIn elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery, intrathecal fentanyl as an anesthetic adjuvant may correlate with reduced pain scores on PODS1-3 and decreased opioid requirements on POD3.High-dose fentanyl does not provide significant therapeutic advantages.
trial registrationThe study registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ), Clinical Trials identifier ChiCTR2200058362 (2022/04/07).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.