Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390064›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2025

Exploration of novel harm reduction approaches to increase client engagement (ENHANCE): protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Rachel E Gicquelais, Caitlin J Conway, Mikaela Becker, Erika J Bailey, Cullen Bosworth, Rebecca Miller, Katy Mijal, Emmie Curran, Bianca Barredo, Sydney Taylor and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rachel E GicquelaisDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI, 53726, USA. gicquelais@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7022-6385
Caitlin J ConwayUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, 701 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Mikaela BeckerVivent Health, 1311 N 6 Th St, Milwaukee, WI, 53212, USA.
Erika J BaileyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 610 Walnut St, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Cullen BosworthUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, 701 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Rebecca MillerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 610 Walnut St, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Katy MijalDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 610 Walnut St, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Emmie CurranVivent Health, 1311 N 6 Th St, Milwaukee, WI, 53212, USA.
Bianca BarredoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 610 Walnut St, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Sydney TaylorDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 610 Walnut St, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Elizabeth Salisbury-AfsharDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
David W SealTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Marguerite BurnsDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Ryan P WestergaardDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 610 Walnut St, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.

Funding

Mobile health strategies to support longitudinal engagement in harm reduction servicesR01DA057645 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Rachel Eleanor Gicquelais, Ryan Patrick Westergaard · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA057645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSyringe services programs (SSPs) reduce the risk of overdose by distributing supplies like naloxone. SSPs also support clients in meeting their basic needs via referrals to organizations providing food, housing, and healthcare. This paper describes the Exploration of Novel Harm Reduction Approaches to Increase Client Engagement (ENHANCE) Project, a prospective cohort study developed in partnership with people who use drugs that aims to characterize the influence of longitudinal engagement in SSPs on overdose risk behaviors.

methodsThe ENHANCE Project protocol was developed with a community leadership team of 16 people with living experience of drug use who were clients from four SSPs in Wisconsin that serve as study recruitment sites. The community leadership team met five times to conceptualize the study priorities, protocol, recruitment strategies, and measures. ENHANCE will enroll 400 people who use opioids and/or stimulants via recruitment of clients from study sites and peer referrals. Clients will report on primary outcomes (overdose experiences and risk behaviors) and other covariates (substance use history and behaviors, mental and physical health, satisfaction of basic needs, stigma, and others) over a 2-year follow-up period. At enrollment, clients select a self-generated identification code that is documented in all subsequent harm reduction services received from ten SSPs in Wisconsin. These data will be linked to study survey data using probabilistic methods and used for the primary exposure variable, frequency of using SSP services. ENHANCE will test the primary hypothesis that more frequently using SSP services is associated with reduced overdose risk behavior frequency. PRELIMINARY

resultsAmong the first 125 clients enrolled, 22.4% (N = 28) reported personally experiencing an opioid overdose in the 6 months before enrollment and 38.4% (N = 48) experienced adverse effects after using stimulants. The most common overdose risk behaviors reported in the past 30 days were using opioids while alone (mean: 9.9 days [standard deviation: 10.7]) and injecting heroin (mean: 9.3 days [standard deviation: 12.8]).

conclusionsThis study will identify aspects of harm reduction services that are most effective in reducing overdose risk to inform future service provision, funding, and policy efforts.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseHarm ReductionNeedle-Exchange ProgramsPatient ParticipationAdultFemaleHumansMaleNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsProspective StudiesRisk-TakingWisconsinNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsCommunity-engaged researchOverdoseProspective cohort studyStudy protocolSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID40390064
PMCPMC12087053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.