ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Surgical alteration of uterine space influences embryonic loss and fetal growth in the contemporary pig.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal impact of hypothyroidism on porcine fetal growth and skeletal development.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Temporal endocrine and hematological consequences of biological extremes in porcine birth weight.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLitter size is a key economic trait in the swine industry, and ongoing selection for this trait has increased ovulation rates without producing a corresponding increase in uterine capacity. Overcrowding, intensifies competition between fetuses, increasing within-litter variation and the occurrence of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).
methodsWe utilized a combination of unilateral oviductal ligation (UOL) and unilateral hysterectomy-ovariectomy (UHO), to create apposing biological extremes of intrauterine crowding. A total of twenty gilts including N = 7 UHO, N = 7 UOL and N = 6 unaltered controls (CON) were synchronized and bred via artificial insemination. Embryonic loss and fetal viability were evaluated on gestation day 95. The fetal population intensively phenotyped including morphometric assessment of skull shape.
resultsAs expected, UOL significantly reduced litter size, but increased embryonic survival, fetal viability, body weight and uniformity compared to CON. In contrast, UHO significantly increased early embryonic loss, but did not alter fetal viability, body weight or uniformity within litter. UOL increased the absolute weight of all organs compared to UHO and CON, with the exception of the brain (BRN) resulting in a significant reduction in BRN consistent with the established brain-sparing effect. The ratio of skull curve-to-linear length (C: L) was significantly reduced in UOL fetuses and found to be strongly correlated with brain-to-liver weight ratio (BRN: LVR).
conclusionsThe results of this study confirm the negative effects of uterine crowding on fetal growth. They further suggest that contemporary gilts approach the limit of uterine capacity, such that increased crowding results in additional early embryonic loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.