Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390024›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025

The implementation of physical activity policies in the Netherlands: a study applying the Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI).

Fleur Heuvelman, Jeroen Lakerveld, Kevin Volf, Catherine B Woods, Suzanne van Mourik-Boelema, Saskia van den Berg, Nicolette R den Braver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fleur HeuvelmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.heuvelman@amsterdamumc.nl.
Jeroen LakerveldDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kevin VolfDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Catherine B WoodsDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Suzanne van Mourik-BoelemaCentre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Saskia van den BergCentre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Nicolette R den BraverDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 09100252210002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuing high levels of population physical inactivity necessitate effective government policies to cultivate healthy physical activity (PA) environments. The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index (PA-EPI) is a monitoring framework and tool to assess the implementation of policies that promote PA. This study aims to assess the extent of PA policy implementation in the Netherlands and identify recommendations for action to improve its PA environment, using the PA-EPI.

methodsThe PA-EPI application was a stepwise process in which evidence of policy implementation was collected and validated by government officials. A cross-sectoral coalition of non-government independent experts then rated the extent of implementation of 45 indicators of ideal good practice, comparing them against international best practice. On the basis of these expert ratings, a scorecard categorized indicators into high, medium, low or none/very little implementation. In turn, future implementation recommendations were identified by independent experts, prioritized and disseminated.

resultsThe evidence validation by government officials (N = 15) yielded minor changes. Independent experts (N = 14) gave 10 out of the 45 indicators a low implementation score, 28 a medium score and 7 a high score. The policy domain of transport and the infrastructure support domain of monitoring and intelligence received high implementation scores. The policy domains of mass media and workplace and the infrastructure support domains of leadership, funding and resources and workforce development received only low scores. Some domains received both high and low implementation scores (i.e. the policy domains of education and sport and recreation for all and the infrastructure support domain of governance). A total of 36 policy recommendations and 26 infrastructure support recommendations were identified. The top prioritized policy recommendations fell within the urban design, education, transport, and sport and recreation for all domains. For infrastructure support, the top prioritized recommendations related to the leadership, funding and resources, and governance domains.

conclusionsThe results reveal important policy implementation gaps and strengths across several domains in the Netherlands. Prioritized recommendations are provided for the government to address these implementation gaps and monitor policy change.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PolicyHealth PromotionEnvironment DesignHumansNetherlandsWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID40390024
PMCPMC12090461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.