Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40390007›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2025

Clinical outcomes of rib fracture stabilization and conservative treatment in a high-volume Asian trauma center: a propensity score-matched retrospective study.

Chia-Cheng Kao, Ke-Cheng Chen, Xu-Heng Chiang, Jen-Hao Chuang, Chao-Wen Lu, Wei-Ling Hsiao, Tzu-Hsin Lin, Hsien-Chi Liao

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07243808 (Comparison of Mixed Reality and Ultrasound Localization Techniques for Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07243808 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Mixed Reality and Ultrasound Localization Techniques for Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsSurgical Stabilization of Rib Fracture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chia-Cheng KaoDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ke-Cheng ChenDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Xu-Heng ChiangDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jen-Hao ChuangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chao-Wen LuDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Ling HsiaoSchool of Nursing, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tzu-Hsin LinDepartment of Traumatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsien-Chi LiaoDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. polarisliao@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRib fractures are common chest wall injuries with conservative treatment and surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) as treatment options. We retrospectively compared the efficacy and long-term prognosis of conservative treatment and SSRF as treatment options for rib fractures.

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted at a single trauma center in Taiwan. The study population comprised patients with rib fractures who underwent conservative treatment or SSRF at the National Taiwan University Hospital between 2017 and 2022. We analyzed the outcomes between the operative and non-operative groups, including the length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, pain scales at admission and follow-up, and post-operative complication rates.

resultsOf the 217 patients with rib fractures in this study, 103 received SSRF, and 114 received conservative treatment. Patients in the operative group had worse consciousness statuses and higher injury severity scores than those in the non-operative group. In addition, patients in the operative group had more preoperative chest complications than those in the non-operative group. Regarding outcomes and long-term prognoses, patients in the operative group had longer intensive care unit and hospital stays than those in the non-operative group; however, patients in the operative group had better recovery quality than those in the non-operative group.

conclusionsOur study showed that, in patients who meet the surgical indications, SSRF is an effective and safe way to relieve acute pain after thoracic injury and achieve better recovery and quality of life after surgical intervention.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentRib FracturesAdultAgedFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTaiwanTrauma CentersTreatment OutcomeAcute painConservative treatmentLength of stayRib fracturesSurgical fixation

Identifiers

PMID40390007
PMCPMC12087070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.