ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025
Labour market attachment before and after hospitalisation for sepsis: a Danish cohort study.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis survivors often experience cognitive, physiological, and functional impairments that may limit return to work (RTW). We aimed to describe changes in workforce attachment among working-age patients with sepsis, both overall and stratified by treatment in general wards versus the intensive care unit (ICU). Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the impact of educational level and to identify factors associated with RTW.
methodsA register-based cohort study including all patients aged 20-63 years with incident community-acquired sepsis admitted to a hospital in the Region of Southern Denmark between 1 January 2016 and 20 March 2018. Labour market attachment was illustrated using area charts, overall and stratified by treatment in general wards versus the ICU. Further, the overall area chart was stratified by educational level. Patients were classified as part of the workforce or non-workforce. A subgroup of the workforce comprised those working. RTW was estimated for the workforce and those working after 12, 52, 104, and 156 weeks. Factors associated with RTW were identified using cause-specific hazards.
resultsOf the 1610 patients with sepsis included, 651 were part of the workforce, with 488 working. After 12 weeks, 69.0% of workforce patients (excluding those censored) had returned to work. This proportion increased to 81.6%, 87.5%, and 90.4% after 52, 104, and 156 weeks, respectively. Among patients working before sepsis, RTW proportions were higher. Several baseline variables and in-hospital measures were associated with RTW among the workforce including younger age (20-39 years), HR = 1.33 (95% CI, 1.05-1.68), no ICU admission, HR = 2.64 (95% CI, 1.81-3.86), lactate < 4 mmol/L, HR = 2.19 (1.13-4.24), and single organ failure, HR = 2.33 (95% CI, 1.16-4.69). While ICU admission had impact on RTW in both the workforce and those working, educational level was unrelated to RTW among those working.
conclusionsMost working-age patients with sepsis were outside the workforce. Working before sepsis was the strongest predictor of RTW. While educational level influenced whether patients were part of the workforce, it was not associated with RTW among those working. No ICU admission was associated with RTW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.