ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Psychometric properties of the Danish SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in patients with pelvic floor disorders and low back pain: item response theory modelling.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Measurement Precision of Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Item Response Theory.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, involving patients in healthcare has become a focus point. Shared decision-making (SDM) is one element of patient involvement and, in many countries, including Denmark, requires culturally adapted and validated questionnaires to measure diverse patient populations' perceptions of this concept. SDM-Q-9, a widely used nine-item generic questionnaire, assesses patients' perception of nine elements during decision-making in consultations. The primary aim of this study is to assess the psychometric performance of the Danish version of the SDM-Q-9 through item response theory (IRT). Additionally, to assess the questionnaire's generic applicability among patients with pelvic floor disorders or low back pain.
methodsAfter treatment decisions, Danish patients with pelvic floor disorders or low back pain rated the level of SDM by completing the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire. Iitem response theory (the Graded Response Model by Samejima) was applied to assess each item's psychometric performance and the questionnaire's generic applicability (among others discriminative ability, precision and item differential functioning).
resultsThe study invited 825 patients for participation and comprised 758 patients for analysis;73% were women, with a mean age of 52 years and a mean SDM score of 3.87. Discrimination parameters (a-scores) for the model ranged from 2.39 (item 1) to 4.48 (item 8). Analysis of the item-information function curves reflected that item 8 demonstrated the highest maximum, indicating higher precision, while items 1, 2 and 9 showed the lowest maxima. Chi
conclusionsThe Danish SDM-Q-9 demonstrates strong overall performance, with the ability to differentiate between the distinct levels of the underlying construct of SDM. However, the high ceiling effect is a critical limitation. While the SDM-Q-9 could serve as a generic questionnaire across samples with varying demographic composition, further exploration of these findings is warranted, particularly across patient samples encompassing more diverse decisions, e.g. patients with life-threatening diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.