ArticleBMC women's health2025
Does adenomyosis influence tumor characteristics and survival in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer??
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adenomyosis is not an independent prognostic factor in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Decision Tree Model for Predicting the Overall Survival of Endometrial Cancer Patients with Adenomyosis.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Impact of uterine adenomyosis on survival outcome of patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coexistence of adenomyosis and cancer of the endometrium has attracted heightened scrutiny, leading to inquiries regarding their possible interactions and clinical ramifications. This study sought to assess the influence of adenomyosis on tumor features and survival outcomes in patients with endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed on 422 patients who underwent surgical intervention for endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma. The cohort was categorized into two groups according to the presence or absence of adenomyosis. Clinical and pathological data were gathered and evaluated to compare tumor features and survival outcomes between the two cohorts.
resultsAdenomyosis was present in 144 (34.1%) patients. Patients in the adenomyosis group demonstrated significantly higher gravidity and parity compared to those without adenomyosis. Lymphovascular space invasion was detected in 8.3% of the adenomyosis group compared to 17.6% in the non-adenomyosis group (a 53% reduction, p = 0.010). Similarly, rates of myometrial invasion (81.3% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.001), cervical stromal invasion (9.0% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.005), and lymph node metastasis (4.2% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in patients with adenomyosis. The five-year overall survival rate was 90.8% in the adenomyosis group and 87.1% in the non-adenomyosis group, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.689).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that adenomyosis is associated with a significant reduction in aggressive tumor characteristics such as myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space involvement, and lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrioid-type endometrial cancer. These findings emphasize that adenomyosis may be a potential protective factor in endometrial cancer prognosis and should be considered in clinical risk assessment. Prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm the long-term effects of adenomyosis on survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.