ArticleBMC nursing2025
Implementing a nurse-led safety planning intervention in emergency departments to prevent suicide reattempts: a stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial protocol (French multicentre randomized controlled trial with a stepped-wedge design).
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05609487 (Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Implementation of a Safety Plan by the Emergency Nurse to Prevent Suicidal Reiteration - National Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial in Stepped-wedge), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Implementation of a Safety Plan by the Emergency Nurse to Prevent Suicidal Reiteration - National Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial in Stepped-wedge
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Six-month outcomes in a French cohort of patients receiving a safety planning type intervention after suicide attempt.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicide prevention is a worldwide challenge, and an emergency department (ED) visit is a key moment to prevent subsequent suicide risk. Previous studies reported the effectiveness of safety plan interventions (SPI), which are recommended by the suicide prevention resource centre and various health ministries. The safety plan encompasses a range of strategies to prevent and manage suicidal thoughts and actions. Our study (PROTECT) aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the SPI before patient discharged after suicide attempt by nurses and other health care professionals in the ED. Secondly, we will examine the implementation of the intervention among healthcare professionals and patients. The primary outcome is the reduction of suicidal behavior at six months, including suicide reattempts and death by suicide, after the index suicide attempt in patients who received the SPI compared to those who received the practices as usual. The effectiveness of the SPI will be evaluated through a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. 2,387 people who have attempted suicide will be identified in 20 EDs and will first be observed during a control phase. The control group (observation phase) is defined by the administration of usual practices, which include the suicidal recontact program (Vigilans) combined with specialized follow-up tailored to each patient. Initially, the research teams will train emergency professionals in the use of the SPI (transition phase). Finally, an intervention phase will be activated during which the SPI will be implemented in addition to practices as usual. PROTECT is the first study to largely evaluate the effectiveness of the SPI and is the first ongoing study with a large number of included participants and participating centres. Significant findings may aid in the adoption of novel nursing care approaches to prevent suicide reattempts in the ED. The present trial has been registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT05609487) since 8 November 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.