ArticleBMC medical education2025
Experiences of soft skills development and assessment by health sciences students and teachers: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiential Learning Through Editorial Practice: ThePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Soft skills and potential covariates in first year health science students in Latin America: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Development and psychometric validation of the soft skills scale for primary school students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Changes in Anxiety Symptoms and Eating Patterns Among Emerging Adult Students in a Non-Traditional School Program During a Mathematics Examination.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Embedding equitable placement opportunities in undergraduate science degrees.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSoft skill development is of growing importance in higher education. However, the definitions of soft skills are unclear and soft skill development and assessment in higher education are underexplored. Therefore, the research question of this study is as follows: What are the experiences of teaching staff and students of the bachelor's internship in health sciences regarding soft skills development and assessment?
methodsFor this qualitative study, using a phenomenological approach, sixteen participants (ten university teachers and six bachelor students) were interviewed via semi structured interviews, based on the theoretical framework of Nicol & Macfarlane's model of self-regulation. The results were analysed through thematic analysis.
resultsThe experiences of soft skills were divided into eight themes related to development and assessment. In terms of development, it is [1] important to show a growth in soft skills. This development depends on [2] the perceived guidance provided by teachers [3], the type of internships, and [4] the perceived supervision in soft skills. Regarding assessment [5], teachers often struggle to evaluate soft skills, highlighting [6] the need for durable assessment of soft skills. Additionally [7], both students and teachers feel a need for more focus on soft skills in education. Furthermore [8], several prior factors, such as acknowledgement of soft skills and self-reflection skills, are mentioned to optimise student development.
conclusionThis study highlights the importance of soft skills development and assessment in higher education. A clear definition of soft skills is recommended. Our findings demonstrate how teachers struggle with their role in soft skills supervision and assessment, with the consequence that students experience a lack of supervision and assessment in soft skills development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.