Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40389925›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Effectiveness of transitional care interventions in patients with serious illness and their caregivers: a systematic review and metanalysis of randomized controlled trial.

Marco Di Nitto, Angela Durante, Gabriele Caggianelli, Jacopo Fiorini, Silvia Sferrazza, Kusumam Pampoorickel, Roberto Accettone, Dhurata Ivziku, Daniela D'Angelo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marco Di NittoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8951-622X
Angela DuranteSant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Health Science Interdisciplinary Center, Pisa, Italy.
Gabriele CaggianelliDepartment of Healthcare Professions, Azienda Ospedaliera Complesso Ospedaliero San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome, Italy. caggianelligabriele@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1985-3068
Jacopo FioriniNursing Department, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4964-8794
Silvia SferrazzaAzienda Ospedaliera Complesso Ospedaliero San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome, Italy.
Kusumam PampoorickelClinica Mater Misericordiae di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Roberto AccettoneAzienda Regionale Emergenza Sanitaria ARES 118, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6133-7704
Dhurata IvzikuDepartment of Healthcare Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0091-7524
Daniela D'AngeloItalian Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Scholarship, A JBI Centre of Excellence, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9451-0885

Funding

Center of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship and Research, OPI Rome, Italy 10039, 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with serious illnesses require continuous care from professionals in multiple settings. The care transition interventions aim to promote the safe and timely transfer of patient care across settings through several components including discharge planning, post-discharge communication, and patient/caregiver education on self-management. Despite the reported evidence on transitional care interventions, little is known about their effectiveness for seriously ill patients and their caregivers and for those receiving or needing palliative care.

objectiveAssess the effectiveness of transitional care interventions for outcomes related to seriously ill patients and their caregivers.

methodsA systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA and JBI guidelines. The search was conducted on MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to February 2024. Primary outcomes included mortality and/or survival, symptoms, functional status, caregiver burden, and health-related quality of life. Critical appraisal was performed using the JBI checklist. Evidence certainty was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

resultsWe included 16 studies with 3781 participants. The pooled results of mortality and functional status did not show differences between transitional care and standard of care. Meta-analyses on quality of life (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.33; I2 = 42%; p = 0.09, low certainty of evidence) and symptoms (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.04; I2 = 77.5%; p < 0.01, very low certainty of evidence) suggest a small to moderate improvement for patients receiving transitional care interventions. Concerning caregiver burden, studies showed no difference between transitional care within a palliative care approach versus standard of care (SMD = -0.48, 95% CI -1.03 to 0.07; I2 = 60%; p = 0.11, low certainty of evidence).

conclusionsTransitional care interventions can improve quality of life and symptoms, although based on low or very low certainty of evidence. Subgroup analysis suggests that transitional care intervention for those receiving palliative care improves quality of life and symptoms. Further research should increase the robustness of evidence on the effectiveness of transitional care interventions in seriously ill patients. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42022319848.

Indexed as

Palliative careQuality of lifeSerious illnessTransitional care

Identifiers

PMID40389925
PMCPMC12087120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.