ArticleBMC nursing2025
Effectiveness of transitional care interventions in patients with serious illness and their caregivers: a systematic review and metanalysis of randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of transitional care program in older adults with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Readiness for Hospital Discharge and Quality of Life Among Patients Undergoing Surgery for Type A Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Nursing open · 2026Observational
- Investigating the Impact of Transitional Care Model Implementation on Quality of Life and Care Burden in Family Caregivers of Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Iran.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Outcomes of inpatient chemoradiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and significant functional impairment.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- From the hospital to the community: reshaping the palliative care paradigm.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with serious illnesses require continuous care from professionals in multiple settings. The care transition interventions aim to promote the safe and timely transfer of patient care across settings through several components including discharge planning, post-discharge communication, and patient/caregiver education on self-management. Despite the reported evidence on transitional care interventions, little is known about their effectiveness for seriously ill patients and their caregivers and for those receiving or needing palliative care.
objectiveAssess the effectiveness of transitional care interventions for outcomes related to seriously ill patients and their caregivers.
methodsA systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA and JBI guidelines. The search was conducted on MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to February 2024. Primary outcomes included mortality and/or survival, symptoms, functional status, caregiver burden, and health-related quality of life. Critical appraisal was performed using the JBI checklist. Evidence certainty was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
resultsWe included 16 studies with 3781 participants. The pooled results of mortality and functional status did not show differences between transitional care and standard of care. Meta-analyses on quality of life (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.33; I2 = 42%; p = 0.09, low certainty of evidence) and symptoms (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.04; I2 = 77.5%; p < 0.01, very low certainty of evidence) suggest a small to moderate improvement for patients receiving transitional care interventions. Concerning caregiver burden, studies showed no difference between transitional care within a palliative care approach versus standard of care (SMD = -0.48, 95% CI -1.03 to 0.07; I2 = 60%; p = 0.11, low certainty of evidence).
conclusionsTransitional care interventions can improve quality of life and symptoms, although based on low or very low certainty of evidence. Subgroup analysis suggests that transitional care intervention for those receiving palliative care improves quality of life and symptoms. Further research should increase the robustness of evidence on the effectiveness of transitional care interventions in seriously ill patients. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42022319848.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.